By Ananya S Guha
The government has set up a monitoring cell to track attendance in offices in the country. This is laudable, because attendance or the abysmal lack of it is what ails our governance today. Heads of offices seem unable to control this malaise because the rest of the staff seem to be in cahoots with one another. All differences are then buried, and colleagues then show an astonishing display of solidarity. Coming late for work is of course another bane. The usual riposte that he or she should at least inform that he will be late, does not hold much water because why should one be an inveterate late comer? All these: punctuality, or the lack of it and coming late are related to the work ethic.. And what constitutes such a work ethic? It is commitment and transparency. The usual shrug: “ this is not my work “ is one of the commonest excuses. This is effete, anything can be anyone`s work, depending upon what the situation warrants. The overarching aspect is achieving goals and completing tasks.
How the monitoring of attendance will take place in the entire country is difficult to assess. But the challenge has been taken and a warning sounded. That is the positive. The casual attitude, with impunity that ` no one can touch me` is not only reprehensible, but something that should not be tolerated. But government rules also allow all kinds of leave to make this possible, one of the egregious things is ` sick ` leave when the whole world knows that one is not sick ( sic!). Then there is this thing : called restricted leave, which is anything but at all restrictive! How not to work, rather than to work is the ideology. However mere attendance will not suffice. There are the truant makers, who once on arriving kick up all kinds of ruses to go out and then return just in time for lunch! And that means a minimum of an hour. Then of course is the ever handy tea. Deadlines suffer and so do the bosses. And god forbid if the boss is also of the chameleon type, liking to play this game of musical chairs or hide and seek. Meetings, meetings and meetings are another ploy for work coming to a veritable standstill. The bosses in faraway New Delhi are notorious for this. Bureaucrats can and should be bureaucratic, but not others such as academics.
Why is punctuality so important? It is: for the simple reason that work gets attended to on time, and this sets an example to other colleagues. Setting an example, achieving goals are clear cut objectives, not the usual refrain : “ I will do it tomorrow“. This is one of the most frustrating things to handle at work. The other is as mentioned earlier: “ this is not my work “. But sometimes the usually languid worker is transformed with alacrity into a fire ball of energy when the work is related to processing his medical bill or LTC or for that matter leave. The reasons for this metabolism are not far to seek. Just when you think happily that the person has been transformed, then does the truth dawn on you ever so painfully.
This is the first time that we have seen that a government centrally located addressing such a vexed issue. This must be supported. Attending work punctually is not only a motion, it entails responsibility, commitment and love for one`s job. This is work ethic. Coercion will not help here, what is required is vigorous self examination and setting honest examples.When we indefinitely harp on regular attendance the concomitant is regular and productive work, not dashing off to canteens for continuous cups of tea, which in turn results in desultory habits.
The other is that it must be impressed that these steps are taken seriously and any breach will be taken serious cognizance- not the usual rigmarole of truncating a leave. The message must be loud and clear that the errant will be held responsible. Can this be done all over the country? It can if an effective and stringent monitoring mechanism is put to place. And of course the flagrantly errant.
The notion held since time immemorial that government jobs are ` secure ` has been the killer. They are so secure that they have led to insecurity. They are so secure that we relax comfortably. They are so secure that some think they are invincible. They are so secure, that often the sickening response is: “ I know so and so…“. So what? The ` so what?` positing should now be used with more vigour and, aggressively.The ones who think they are infallible are the ones who also think that they have the blessings of a few. It is high time that now while tackling such problems we pay two hoots to the supposedly powerful, in the so called higher echelons. Every system, every institution is suffering from such a syndrome, it is high time that the dismantling process begins. Then only will the edifice, or the cookie not crumble!
Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2014/10/-better-late-than-never/