Articles – Manipur News

Checkmate On The Fossil Fuel Dialogues

Donald Trump’s aggression in the Middle East reflects the West’s intended move to dominate the world economy which in other words can be equated to Nazi Germany’s campaign to subjugate the world militarily and politically with dominance over agricultural, mineral and oil rich countries By Salam Rajesh The Unites States’ interference in the Middle East […]

The post Checkmate On The Fossil Fuel Dialogues first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

By Salam Rajesh

The Unites States’ interference in the Middle East is largely seen by observers as a premeditated campaign to consolidate its hold on the oil rich nations which the western states require to sustain and bolster their global geopolitical dominance – politically and economically.

The United Nations has since been in the thick of heated debates over ending fossil fuel resourcing, exploitation and production as a means to address critical concerns on global warming and climate extremes that otherwise are threatening humanity and the planet with dire consequences if actions are not taken up immediately.

The call to reduce and halt fossil fuel use extensively has been the centre-piece of extended dialogues in several of the climate conferences around the world – Belem, Abu Dhabi, Baku, Kunming, Montreal, Paris, Tokyo, and many more.

Yet, the dialogues have remained stuck in most instances, with world leaders like Donald Trump kicking aside these dialogues as a ‘waste of time’. The United States had recently moved away from these dialogues by distancing itself from the UN functionaries, with even Trump saying that climate change is a ‘lie’.

In recent climate conferences there were heated debates between fossil fuel lobbyists and those suggesting reducing and limiting fossil fuel use globally.

The COP30 at Belem in Brazil, held in November last year, came up with a statement on transitioning away from fossil fuels, supported by over 80 countries including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Cambodia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Denmark, Fiji, Finland, Ireland, Jamaica, Kenya, Luxembourg, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Micronesia, Nepal, Netherlands, Panama, Spain, Slovenia, Vanuatu and Tuvalu.

The declaration is grounded in the scientific truth that fossil fuels are the primary driver of the climate crisis, and subsequently the Government of Colombia, in alliance with the Government of the Netherlands, announced the first international conference on just transition away from fossil fuels.

The conference proposed to be held at Santa Marta, Colombia, on 28 April later this year is projected as a broad intergovernmental, multi-sectoral platform, complementary to the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), and designed to identify legal, economic, and social pathways for phasing out fossil fuels.

The proposed climate conference seeks in the deliberation on financial and trade mechanisms, macroeconomic challenges, fossil fuel subsidy phase out, renewable energy acceleration, economic diversification, and labor reconversion.

The Belem climate conference had some immediate results, such as, following the leaders’ summit at Belem, Netherlands’ Prime Minister went to Aruba to announce the closure of the oil refinery with a Dutch green subsidy fund. As of 2030, the Netherlands will prohibit electricity production with coal.

The atoll nation of Tuvalu, which is currently facing total submergence due to rising sea level as an after-effect of global warming, raised the urgency of climate action while noting that achieving the climate goals required international cooperation.

Tuvalu was one of the first countries to call for the development of a fossil fuel treaty, offering the clearest pathway for ‘a negotiated, fair and forcible transition away from coal, oil and gas’. The International Court of Justice, too, confirmed that acting in line with climate science is a legal obligation.

The proposed treaty process complements the Paris Climate agreement by addressing fossil fuel phase out directly.

Urging global community to support the proposed treaty, one of Tuvalu ministers called out that, “We are already drowning, but we will not give up and we will never give up. We are headed towards a point of no return and we need to do something (fast)”.

The Belem conference did emphasize that phasing out fossil fuels requires substantial growth in renewable energy, which is in other words is the energy transition that is necessary to address climate goals and to achieve stable economies, and overall security.

Meanwhile, even as these heated dialogues are doing the rounds in contrasting political scenario, climate watch groups are coming up with findings that are warnings of dire consequences if actions on climate mitigation and adaptation processes are not initiated post-haste.

The Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) noted that ‘a large region of the subtropical and the northeast North Atlantic, including the Norwegian Sea, had the warmest sea surface temperatures (SSTs) on record for the time of year’.

The SSTs were higher than the average in large parts of the North Pacific Ocean as well and were near normal in central and eastern Pacific Ocean, because of the prevailing weak La Nina conditions, C3S said.

In the Southern Hemisphere, where it is summer season now, temperatures in southern South America, Northern Africa, most of Australia and Antarctica were much higher than the normal. This lead to extensive and intense heat waves in many regions and even triggered devastating wildfires, the climate watch group said.

The excessive heat that generated wildfires in southeastern Australia in the second week of January earlier this year were made five times more likely and 1.6 degrees Celsius hotter due to global warming and consequent climate change, according to an analysis by the World Weather Attribution (WWA) consortium.

The cold snaps on land did not have much of an impact on sea surface temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere, especially close to Europe and North America. The average sea surface temperatures between the latitudes 60°S–60°N was 20.68°C was the fourth highest average SST on record.

All said and done, the unprecedented winter storm that lashed parts of the United States, including New York, earlier this year is a fair warning that climate extremes are becoming more extreme by the year.

The post Checkmate On The Fossil Fuel Dialogues first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

Read more / Original news source: https://thefrontiermanipur.com/checkmate-on-the-fossil-fuel-dialogues/

Building Scientific Temper for Viksit Universities in Manipur

Beyond Infrastructure: Why Intellectual Courage and Evidence-Based Inquiry Must Anchor Higher Education in the State By Dr Maibam Birla Singh National Science Day, observed every year on 28 February, commemorates the discovery of the Raman Effect by Nobel Laureate Sir C.V. Raman in 1928. His ground-breaking work demonstrated that when light passes through a transparent […]

The post Building Scientific Temper for Viksit Universities in Manipur first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

Beyond Infrastructure: Why Intellectual Courage and Evidence-Based Inquiry Must Anchor Higher Education in the State

By Dr Maibam Birla Singh

National Science Day, observed every year on 28 February, commemorates the discovery of the Raman Effect by Nobel Laureate Sir C.V. Raman in 1928. His ground-breaking work demonstrated that when light passes through a transparent substance, a small fraction of it scatters with a change in wavelength, revealing crucial information about molecular structure. The discovery not only earned India its first Nobel Prize in the sciences in 1930, but also ignited confidence that world-class scientific research could emerge from Indian soil.

Science in pre-independence India developed under severe institutional and resource constraints, yet it produced work of global significance through the dedication of a few visionary scholars. Colonial policies limited funding, infrastructure and autonomy for advanced research but Indian scientists built a culture of inquiry within universities and laboratories such as the Indian Association for the cultivation of science. In this intellectually vibrant but materially modest environment, C. V. Raman made his landmark discovery of the Raman Effect in 1928, demonstrating that high-quality fundamental research could emerge from India despite colonial limitations. Raman’s work, which earned him the Nobel Prize in Physics, became a powerful symbol of India’s scientific potential and self-reliance. His discovery not only advanced molecular spectroscopy worldwide but also inspired the growth of indigenous scientific institutions and research traditions that later supported India’s post-independence scientific expansion. The true legacy of the Raman Effect lies beyond physics or chemistry. It represents a mindset curiosity-driven inquiry, independent thinking, and faith in the power of reason. Working in pre-independence India with modest resources, Raman proved that scientific excellence does not begin with infrastructure; it begins with intellectual courage.

This message holds special relevance for Manipur and its emerging universities. As higher education institutions in the state continue to develop amidst financial and infrastructural constraints, National Science Day offers a moment for reflection. The future of universities in Manipur will not be determined solely by the scale of their buildings or laboratories, but by the strength of their scientific temper. Scientific temper, a value enshrined in the Constitution of India, refers to a culture of questioning, rational analysis, evidence-based reasoning, and openness to new ideas. For emerging institutions such as Dhanamanjuri University and other universities/colleges across the state, cultivating this mind set is foundational.

Manipur is widely recognized as a powerhouse of Indian sports. Thanks to our sport players and their outstanding achievements on national and international stages fill us with immense pride. The dedication of players and coaches rightly earns them rousing hero’s welcomes when they return home, often celebrated as true sons and daughters of the soil. This collective enthusiasm reflects the strong public support that sports enjoy in our society. However, a similar culture of recognition has not yet fully developed for achievements in academics and scientific research. Success in education and science is too often viewed as an individual accomplishment rather than a shared societal milestone. If we are to build a strong scientific temper in both universities and the wider community, this mindset must evolve. Universities have a crucial role to play in elevating and publicly celebrating intellectual and research achievements, thereby fostering a culture where excellence in science and education is valued, visible, and collectively owned by society.

In Manipur, a region marked by ecological sensitivity and socio-economic complexity, universities are uniquely positioned to confront real and immediate challenges. Beyond delivering higher education, universities must be guided by a clear vision, mission, and mandate that prioritize region-specific problems while generating solutions with global relevance, truly moving from local to global. Critical concerns such as the conservation of Loktak Lake, sustainable wetland management, climate-resilient agriculture, water quality improvement, renewable energy deployment, and responsible exploration of critical minerals require rigorous scientific inquiry grounded in local realities. Addressing these pressing issues demands not only technical capability but also the nurturing of a strong scientific temper and research culture within universities and across society in Manipur.

It may be noted that emerging universities also possess a distinct advantage; their close proximity to the community. In Manipur, this connection makes the cultivation of a strong scientific temper especially important, as it enables institutions to ground inquiry in evidence, encourage critical thinking, and translate knowledge into practical solutions. By aligning research with local needs, universities can build a robust model of region-focused innovation that is both socially responsive and scientifically rigorous. Efforts such as developing low-cost water purification systems, advancing sustainable agriculture and aquaculture models, designing frugal renewable energy technologies, documenting biodiversity, studying medicinal plants, strengthening water and flood management, earth-quakes studies and creating effective waste management solutions all require a culture that values observation, experimentation, and data-driven decision-making. Importantly, many of these challenges do not require extravagant infrastructure. They require clarity of thought, interdisciplinary collaboration, careful fieldwork, and strong theoretical foundations. When students are trained to ask the right questions and faculty are encouraged to pursue problem-oriented research, even modest laboratories can produce meaningful and impactful work. Building scientific temper within universities and society will ensure that such locally driven research delivers credible, scalable, and impactful outcomes for Manipur while contributing to broader global knowledge.

In the digital age, data-driven knowledge must no longer remain confined to elite centers only. Expanding open-access journals, online databases, computational platforms, and regional research networks is essential to enable young universities to participate meaningfully in the global scientific discourse. In this context, universities in Manipur should take the lead in establishing integrated data centers focused on biodiversity, indigenous knowledge systems, and extreme climate events. Such centers would function as vital repositories for systematically documenting species diversity, traditional ecological practices, and region-specific climate risks, transforming fragmented information into accessible, research-ready datasets. By integrating modern tools such as geospatial mapping, remote sensing, and advanced data analytics [artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML)] with community knowledge, universities can generate robust evidence to support conservation planning, climate adaptation, and sustainable resource management. These data hubs would further strengthen interdisciplinary research, inform public policy, and enhance early-warning and resilience planning for floods, droughts, and other climate extremes. Ultimately, developing well-curated and dynamic data centers is essential for nurturing scientific temper, safeguarding indigenous wisdom, and enabling informed, locally grounded decision-making with national and global relevance. What is required, however, is not funding alone but also institutional vision and a vibrant academic culture that recognizes and prioritizes regional importance and relevance based on scientific temper and culture. Building that culture means nurturing intellectual integrity, promoting debate, encouraging student-led research initiatives, and strengthening mentorship. It means valuing ideas over hierarchy and evidence over assumption. It means creating an academic environment where curiosity is rewarded and critical thinking is celebrated.

As Sir C.V. Raman once remarked that the essence of science lies in independent thinking and hard work, not merely in equipment or infrastructure. For universities in Manipur, this insight is profoundly relevant. Resource limitations need not be barriers; they can instead become catalysts for creativity and resilience. On this National Science Day 2026, to become Viksit universities in Manipur we must introspect, and discuss on how to embrace scientific temper as the cornerstone of their growth. By investing in strong foundations, rigorous education, interdisciplinary research, collaborative networks, and community engagement, the state can shape institutions that are intellectually vibrant and socially responsive.

Just as a scattered ray of light once revealed hidden molecular truths, a culture of scientific inquiry can illuminate the path forward for higher scientific education in Manipur. The future of the state’s universities will ultimately depend not only on resources, but on the courage to think independently, question deeply, and innovate responsibly.

The question before us is not whether science is important. It is whether we are prepared to place scientific temper at the center of our educational and developmental vision.

National Science Day is a reminder. The responsibility that follows is ours.

(The writer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemistry, Dhanamanjuri University (DMU) Manipur and may be contacted at birla_26@yahoo.co.in )

The post Building Scientific Temper for Viksit Universities in Manipur first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

SIR and the Indigenous Question in Manipur

The Special Intensive Revision revives debate over citizenship, infiltration, and the ambiguity surrounding the ‘Any Kuki Tribes’ entry in Manipur’s Scheduled Tribes list. With no clear historical or demographic basis for the 2003 insertion, defining indigeneity under the new nomenclature may prove contentious. By Salam Rajesh India is currently in the process of executing a […]

The post SIR and the Indigenous Question in Manipur first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

By Salam Rajesh

India is currently in the process of executing a major task on the identification of its native citizens through a revision in the electoral roll across the country, an exercise that is projected to have hiccups and significant demographic impacts.

The countrywide SIR (Special Intensive Revision) seeks in weeding out the unwanted elements – the unauthorized, illegal entrants to the country via dubious means – infiltration through porous international borders, refugees from ethnic conflicts and wars, illegal immigration, migrant labor, and asylum seekers – all rolled into one.

For a starter, the southern State of Kerala removed a massive 897,211 individuals from its electoral roll, in obviously the process of weeding out unidentified individuals living in the State without authorization.

The Election Commission of India published the final electoral roll for Kerala after the SIR exercise, minus the near nine lakh ‘non-native’ individuals, leaving the actual number of eligible voters in that State at 2,69,53,644 voters, as compared to 2,78,50,855 before the Special Intensive Revision began in October 2025.

In the revised list, male voters numbered 1,31,26,048, while female voters accounted for 1,38,27,319, and transgender voters at 277. The number of overseas voters in the updated roll is 2,23,558, while service voters stand at 54,110.

So, keeping in mind this huge exercise in deleting a chunk of ‘non-native’ electorates from the state’s electoral list, it then comes to the basic question on how Manipur State will fare in this Special Intensive Revision exercise.

For one thing, there are repeated allegations of the unauthorized entry of elements from two neighboring countries – Myanmar and Bangladesh – in all of these years, yet so far failing to do a similar exercise to weed out the undesired elements.

The porous international border with neighboring Myanmar has always been the cited reason for the clandestine entry of illegal immigrants, smugglers, drug runners, armed militants, and so forth. Besides that, the lack of a foolproof mechanism to check entries at Jiribam, Mao Gate and Moreh has also been a factor for the unchecked entry of ‘foreign’ elements into Manipur.

Civil society organizations based in the State have given the call for conducting the NRC (National Register of Citizenship) before proceeding with the SIR exercise in view of the allegations over unaccounted number of ‘non-native’ individuals living in the State without valid documents.

Some time back, too, there was uproar over unreasonable increase in electorates within the Paomata circle in the northern uplands by almost over one hundred thousand individuals, beyond reasons unfathomable.

In the midst of these developments, Union home minister Amit Shah had announced in Guwahati the other day that all undesired elements from the North East region would be identified and kicked out.

This, of course, is better said than done. The northeastern states are well known for the controversies over large number of ‘infiltrators’ living and working in these states without valid reasons.

Assam and Arunachal Pradesh had issues with the Chakma refugees from Bangladesh. Manipur and Mizoram are infested with war refugees from neighboring Myanmar, plus the Rohingya refugees after genocide in that country, and added with the perpetual problem of the infiltration of drug runners and their henchmen.

The Centre had initiated process to fence the entire stretch of the international border shared by Myanmar with the Indian states of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram and Tripura, but that again is facing hiccups following objections from the States on the controversial issue of the free movement regime (FMR).

For Manipur, the SIR exercise could be an issue based on the demographic imbalance created by large infiltration particularly from Myanmar, with equal concern on allegations of infiltration from Bangladesh.

The effectiveness of the Inner Line Permit (ILP) system had long been in doubt over reports that the modus operandi of ‘officials’ at the entry points, particularly for the land routes, was turning the operation into a money-minting process by issuing ILPs with fake Aadhar cards.

All said and done, given the reason of the recent ethnic conflicts in the State vis-à-vis the dominance of armed militants ruling the roost, it is probable that the SIR exercise is going to face a rough-shod experience with most likely ‘disturbances’ from the armed non-state actors with dubious objectives, as fairly demonstrated at Sinakeithel village on Monday earlier this week.

Kuki groups had said that they will have nothing doing with the Manipur Government unless their demand for ‘separate administration’ is fulfilled. Yet, with the Central Government flatly denying this, it is perhaps going to be a hurdle for the SIR exercise in the ‘Kuki-inhabited’ pockets within Churachandpur and Kangpokpi districts.

The issue is further complicated by the inclusion of the terminology ‘Any Kuki Tribes’ as was published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary on 8th January, 2003 (in serial No.33 after Poumai in serial 30, Tarao in serial 31 and Kharam in serial 32) recognizing scheduled tribes for the State, where the contention from various angles was that the terminology was vague and does not specify any known tribe(s) in the State as such.

Incidentally, no other Indian State had such vague naming of tribe or terminology in the Amendment to the Act of 2002, thereby creating room for doubt on manipulation to certain degree with none opposing the inclusion at that time.

This particular terminology was (re)inserted in the country’s The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Gazette of India No.10 of 2003) at a time when the Union Government amended the Act to accord official recognition to few more tribes as Scheduled Tribes of Manipur under the Indian Constitution, and further at a time when a prominent Kuki leader was a minister at the Centre.

The coincidence is reflective of manipulation where the terminology ‘Any Kuki Tribes’ did not feature in the earlier schedule. So, unless this terminology is erased from the scheduled tribes list for Manipur, it is going to make matters complicated at the time of the SIR exercise.

Who would be the ‘Any Kuki Tribes’, and on what basis with reference to the demography and known history of the State, and the population counts all through these years. It will be difficult to name any specific tribe as ‘Indigenous’ under this new nomenclature other than the known tribes already in the scheduled tribes list for the State prior to 2003.

Statistically, Manipur’s total population is seen as rising in every census count. Whereas, this increase is neither re-assessed for validation nor re-confirmed on ground, that is, ground truthing vis-à-vis the allegations of infiltration and establishment of unidentified new villages (some allegedly within Protected Areas such as Reserved Forests and Wildlife Sanctuaries).

In all, the call for NRC exercise prior to SIR exercise sounds reasonable to avoid complicacy in assessing the actual count of heads eligible to cast votes in the State, albeit proxy citizenship and possible forged documents to identify themselves as ‘Indigenous’.

The post SIR and the Indigenous Question in Manipur first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

Read more / Original news source: https://thefrontiermanipur.com/sir-and-the-indigenous-question-in-manipur/

Loktak Fishers Strive to achieve GBF Targets

Champu Khangpok fishers turn global biodiversity goals into grassroots action at Loktak Lake. The fishing community makes it a point to organize important annual events highlighting environmental and ecological concerns, sensitizing locals on the objectives of the GBF targets with prioritization on the long-term conservation of the freshwater Loktak Lake and its biological diversity. By Salam […]

The post Loktak Fishers Strive to achieve GBF Targets first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

Champu Khangpok fishers turn global biodiversity goals into grassroots action at Loktak Lake. The fishing community makes it a point to organize important annual events highlighting environmental and ecological concerns, sensitizing locals on the objectives of the GBF targets with prioritization on the long-term conservation of the freshwater Loktak Lake and its biological diversity.

By Salam Rajesh

In these past several recent years, the fishing community thriving upon the floating island village of Champu Khangpok within Loktak Ramsar site in India’s far flung northeastern State of Manipur had continuously been contributing their mite in achieving locally some of the goals outlined in the targets set under the Global Biodiversity Framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

The Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) that came into force at the CBD Kunming-Montreal convention during 2022 end came up with several goals that primarily aimed at achieving targets addressing biodiversity loss and species decline worldwide.

Much of the CBD’s GBF Targets – 23 targets in all – predominantly focuses on incorporating the active participation of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs) in achieving the set goals in both short and long terms.

Fishers staging awareness drive in Loktak Lake.

Keeping this background in perspective, the fishing community of Champu Khangpok floating island village had since set themselves to task in contributing meaningfully towards achieving some of the aspects outlined in the CBD GBF targets in their own humble way, howsoever small their efforts might seem to be.

Champu Khangpok marked the observation of World Wetlands Day 2026 earlier this year with a cleanup drive within the lake and along the waterway of Yangoi Achouba (albeit Nambul River), prioritizing the fact that the lake had since become a dumping ground of urban wastes carried by the river along its flow through Imphal city, a fairly populated urbanized zone.

Champu Khangpok villagers also take upon themselves the task of regulating capture fishery to prevent species population decline within the lake and to restrict random capture of fingerlings during the spawning season, and in preventing unethical fishing methods using LED blubs at nighttime and electrocuting fish using batteries.

The fishing community makes it a point to organize important annual events highlighting environmental and ecological concerns, sensitizing locals on the objectives of the GBF targets with prioritization on the long term conservation of the freshwater Loktak Lake and its biological diversity.

Target 3 of the CBD’s GBF focuses on the conservation of 30 percent of the land, waters and the seas globally to protect life on land and in water. Within this target is an important element to recognize the Indigenous and traditional territories.

The Convention recognizes that ‘Indigenous peoples and local communities often own, occupy and manage areas with unique and significant biodiversity. The appropriate recognition of these areas, therefore, could make important contributions in achieving this target’.

This consideration comes with the perspective that the rights of the Indigenous peoples and local communities must be respected fully, including obtaining their free, prior and informed consent in all matters.

The Convention is convinced that the well-governed, effectively managed and representative protected areas, and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs), are a proven method for safeguarding both habitats and populations of species and for delivering important ecosystem services and multiple benefits to people.

The CBD has made it a valid point that ‘local people managed protected areas is a central element of biodiversity conservation strategies at the local, national and global levels’.

This consideration of IPLCs’ contribution in safeguarding biodiversity adds strength in achieving the GBF’s Target 4 which focuses on halting species extinction, protecting genetic diversity, and in managing human-wildlife conflicts.

Target 4 specifically ensures urgent management actions ‘to halt human induced extinction of known threatened species and for the recovery and conservation of species, in particular threatened species, and to significantly reduce extinction risk’.

The goal further is ‘to maintain and restore the genetic diversity within and between populations of native, wild and domesticated species to maintain their adaptive potential, including through in-situ and ex-situ conservation and sustainable management practices’.

In the same breadth, Target 6 of the GBF looks at addressing the menace of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) of plants and animals, seeking the reduction of the introduction of IAS by 50 percent globally within a time frame, and, thereto, minimize their impact on the localized biodiversity.

The objective of Target 6 is broadly outlined as: ‘Eliminate, minimize, reduce and or mitigate the impacts of invasive alien species on biodiversity and ecosystem services by identifying and managing pathways of the introduction of alien species, preventing the introduction and establishment of priority IAS, reducing the rates of introduction and establishment of other known or potential IAS by at least 50 percent, by 2030, eradicating or controlling IAS especially in priority sites, such as islands’.

This is one of the priority areas that the Loktak fishers have specifically focused upon in all of these years, highlighting time and again on the menace of aquatic plants, and fish, that are alien to the freshwater Loktak Lake and which are proving as nuisance plants, and fish, within the lake.

Another of the issues faced by the Loktak fishers is the level of pollution within the lake, accentuated by the pollutant loads and sewerage discharge from the urban areas. The Nambul River carries maximum pollutant loads from the urbanized Imphal city areas, a factor for high pollution level in the lake.

This issue is reflected in the GBF’s Target 7 which specifically focuses on reducing pollution to levels that are not harmful to biodiversity.

Target 7 specifies on ‘reducing pollution risks and the negative impact of pollution from all sources, by 2030, to levels that are not harmful to biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, considering its cumulative effects’.

It further seeks in ‘reducing excess nutrients lost to the environment by at least half including through more efficient nutrient cycling and use; reducing the overall risk from pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals by at least half including through integrated pest management, based on science, taking into account food security and livelihoods; and also preventing, reducing, and working towards eliminating plastic’.

In a nutshell, achieving these targets might be a herculean task for the marginalized fishing community of Loktak Lake, whereas, the zeal to contribute their mite in the smallest possible ways is there for all to see, visible through their continuous activities in their own humble way.

This is where the state and central authorities can step in to aid the Loktak fishers in their march forward – a tiny step taken yet meaningful in saving, protecting and conserving one of India’s most significant inland freshwater lakes – and, that too, a Ramsar site of international importance.

The post Loktak Fishers Strive to achieve GBF Targets first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

Read more / Original news source: https://thefrontiermanipur.com/loktak-fishers-strive-to-achieve-gbf-targets/

From Participation to Leadership: Structural Challenges for Women in Science

An assessment of representation, retention and policy frameworks in Northeast India in the context of the International Day of Women and Girls in Science. By Dr. Rameshori Yumnam On 11 February 2026, the world observes the International Day of Women and Girls in Science, a global initiative led by UNESCO and UN Women to promote […]

The post From Participation to Leadership: Structural Challenges for Women in Science first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

An assessment of representation, retention and policy frameworks in Northeast India in the context of the International Day of Women and Girls in Science.

By Dr. Rameshori Yumnam

On 11 February 2026, the world observes the International Day of Women and Girls in Science, a global initiative led by UNESCO and UN Women to promote full and equal participation of women in science and technology. This day is not merely symbolic, it is a reminder that inclusion in science must extend beyond classrooms into leadership, recognition and sustained opportunity. In Northeast India, enrollment of girls in education is often higher than that of boys. Many young women actively choose science streams, pursue postgraduate studies and complete doctoral research in significant numbers. The region does not lack talent or academic excellence. What it often lacks is continuity, visibility, structural support and proportional recognition.

A telling example appears in Lilavati’s Daughters: The Women Scientists of India, a landmark collection highlighting Indian women scientists. From the entire Northeast region, only one scientist, Prof. Joyanti Chutia of Assam, a distinguished theoretical physicist, is prominently represented. While her achievements are deeply inspiring, the limited representation from a region rich in intellectual potential reflects a broader challenge: visibility and recognition remain uneven.

Gender inequality in science is not new. Even in the early twentieth century, women pursuing scientific careers faced significant barriers. Mileva Mari?, Albert Einstein’s first wife, was a trained physicist and mathematician who studied alongside Einstein at the Swiss Federal Polytechnic in Zurich. She was the only woman in her cohort and studied in the same physics–mathematics program as Einstein. Their surviving letters show that they discussed physics problems together during their student years. However, historians remain divided on the extent of her contribution to Einstein’s early work. There is no definitive documentary evidence proving that she co-authored or formally contributed to the 1905 papers (including the theory of relativity). Most scholars agree that while she was intellectually capable and deeply engaged in physics discussions, the published work was solely credited to Einstein, whose scientific aspirations were curtailed by personal circumstances and societal expectations. Her story reflects a broader historical pattern in which women’s scientific identities were often overshadowed or under-recognized.

Yet history also offers powerful examples of women who broke barriers. Marie Curie remains one of the most inspiring figures in science. She was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and remains the only person to have won Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields: Physics and Chemistry. Her legacy extended beyond her own achievements: her daughter, Irène Joliot-Curie, also went on to win a Nobel Prize. In a scientific world dominated by men, Marie Curie’s perseverance, brilliance and dedication earned her global recognition, often described as “Scientist of the Millenium”. Her story demonstrates that when given opportunity and support, women not only contribute to science, they redefine it. The contrast between invisibility and recognition underscores an important truth: talent exists everywhere, but acknowledgment does not.

In Northeast India, many women pursue advanced research, yet after doctoral studies, they often face social expectations surrounding marriage, family responsibilities, relocation challenges, limited infrastructure and fewer leadership pathways. Entry into science has improved dramatically, but retention, incentives and representation at high-level decision-making platforms remains a concern. Scientific advisory boards, funding committees, research councils, university leadership positions and policy-making bodies must reflect both gender and regional diversity. Women must not only participate in science, they must shape its direction.

There is a pressing need for region-oriented policies that respond to the unique realities of the Northeast. Such policies must focus on strengthening advanced research infrastructure within the region so that talented scholars do not have to migrate elsewhere to pursue quality scientific work. Targeted fellowships, research grants and financial incentives specifically designed for women scientists are essential to sustain their careers and encourage long-term engagement in research. Equally important is promoting greater visibility through awards, leadership opportunities and meaningful media recognition that highlights regional scientific achievements. Establishing strong mentorship networks and regional innovation platforms can provide guidance, collaboration and professional continuity. Above all, ensuring women’s representation in high-level scientific decision-making bodies is crucial so that policy directions, funding priorities and institutional strategies reflect inclusive and regionally relevant perspectives.

On the International Day of Women and Girls in Science 2026 observed yesterday, the conversation needed to move beyond mere enrollment statistics. The Northeast already has capable, qualified and deeply committed women scientists. What was, and continues to be, essential is the creation of an enabling ecosystem one that actively supports, recognizes, and elevates them into meaningful leadership roles. Science thrives on diversity of thought. But diversity must also be visible, valued and empowered. Recognition fuels aspiration, incentives sustain commitment, and representation transforms systems, these are not optional ideals but essential requirements for building an equitable and progressive scientific community.

When we create more Joyanti Chutias, when we support more Mileva Mari?s to complete their journeys and when we encourage the next generation of Marie Curies from every region, we do more than promote equality, we strengthen the very foundation of scientific progress.

(The author is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Zoology, Manipur University. She can be reached at rameshori.yumnam@gmail.com.)

The post From Participation to Leadership: Structural Challenges for Women in Science first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

The Plague of Introduced Species

How cane toads, paragrass, carp and hyacinth became ecological disruptors in Australia and Manipur. By Salam Rajesh Earlier this month, Jennifer Geer writing for A-Z Animal.com, provided a descriptive narrative of how an imported and introduced toad species from Hawaii by the Australian Government ultimately became the proverbial Frankenstein in the making. In 1935, Queensland […]

The post The Plague of Introduced Species first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

How cane toads, paragrass, carp and hyacinth became ecological disruptors in Australia and Manipur.

By Salam Rajesh

Earlier this month, Jennifer Geer writing for A-Z Animal.com, provided a descriptive narrative of how an imported and introduced toad species from Hawaii by the Australian Government ultimately became the proverbial Frankenstein in the making.

In 1935, Queensland in Australia faced a major crisis in its sugar cane crop production after a native beetle species, Greyback Cane Beetle (Dermolepida albohirtum), commenced wreaking havoc on the sugarcane plants.

The beetle larvae lived in the soil and chewed on sugarcane roots, stunting growth or killing the plants. This incurred major economic losses for the sugarcane farmers. There was a need to find a solution fast enough to prevent further losses.

Seeking a natural solution to kill the grubs, the Australian government imported Cane Toads (Rhinella marina) from Hawaii, with the hope that the toads would eat the grubs and save the sugarcane.

Unfortunately enough, as history proved, the worst-case scenario occurred. The toads did not keep the beetle populations in check. Instead, they became one of Australia’s most destructive (alien) invasive species and an ecological disaster, writes Geer. Today, the toads are considered invasive species in Australia, the Caribbean Islands, Hawaii, and Florida.

In August 1935, the BSES (Queensland Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations) released 2400 cane toads into sugarcane plantations in Gordonvale, North Queensland. By 1950, the Australian government declared the cane toad an invasive predator.

Dangers from the toads included poisoning animals that prey on them, outcompeting native species for resources, and their voracious appetites. Geer writes that 75 species of Australian crocodiles, lizards, and freshwater turtles were threatened by the toads.

Some of the animals that are in danger of dying after they eat a cane toad include the Australian monitor lizards, quolls, tiger snakes, and freshwater crocodiles. Many of these animals are designated as threatened species in the country.

This story fairly well finds reflection in India, too, with stories of introduced species ultimately becoming monsters in disguise. Like most States in the country, Manipur too is not an exception to such stories of disasters.

In the mid 1970s, the State’s veterinary department reportedly introduced Paragrass (Brachiaria mutica) as fodder for milch cows that, too, were imported from Haryana. It was reported that the cows were housed in a mechanized cattle farm in the Iroishemba area in Imphal West District.

The remains of the feed, that is, the undigested or the uneaten parts of the paragrass soon found their way to the riverbank of Nambul River via its feeder rivulets, either as cow excreta or intentionally dumped as waste. Today, paragrass is one of the major nuisance semi-aquatic plants in most water bodies within the Manipur River basin.

Paragrass (Napi tujombi in the vernacular) is a major headache for Loktak Lake (a Ramsar site) managers as this fast spreading grass had virtually spread its tentacles across the peripheral shoreline, crowded over the floating biomass Phumdi, and literally had become the major reason for depletion of native plants, in particular the edible aquatic, semi-aquatic and semi-terrestrial species of food and medicinal values.

The story of the notorious cane toads of Australia indeed finds a parallel with the notorious paragrass in Manipur, well defined amongst the floating biomass of Loktak Lake. The one is a story of an animal (an amphibian) and the other is of a plant (a grass). Amazing comparison at the best!

It may be recalled here that Target 6 of the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) re-emphasizes the elimination, minimization, reduction or the mitigation of impacts of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) of plants and animals on the biodiversity and ecosystems across the seven continents.

The GBF’s Target 6 specifically seeks the prevention of the introduction and establishment of priority invasive alien species, reducing the rates of introduction and establishment of other known, or potential, IAS plants and animals by at least 50 percent by the target year 2030.

For the Asia and the Pacific CBD Regional Group, 37 member countries including India have set at least one national target to be achieved by year 2030.

On this end, the National Biodiversity Authority of India (NBA) in 2022 had framed lists of invasive alien species of plants and animals under its Inland Invasive Alien Species of Fishes of India that are of priority for control, reduction and elimination throughout the country by year 2030.

Top on the list of the Inland Invasive Alien Species of Fishes of India according to the NBA is one of the commonest cultured fishes in the country, and in Manipur too, and that is, the Common Carp (Eurasian or European carp, Cyprinus carpio; Puklaobi in the vernacular).

The Common Carp was introduced in Manipur way back in 1964 according to fish expert Professor Waikhom Vishwanath. Interestingly, in India the fish was first introduced in Cuttack in 1939, and in Bangkok in 1957. The fish’s native range covers rivers in Europe and in Asia.

The fish Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus; Tunghanbi in the vernacular) a species originating from East Africa and introduced in India in 1952, finds itself second in the priority list of invasive alien species of fishes to be either controlled or eradicated entirely in India by the target year 2030.

Two very commonly seen aquatic plants in Manipur, namely, Pontederia crassipes (Eichhornia crassipes/Water hyacinth; Kabo-kang) and Alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides; Kabo-napi) find themselves listed on the top of the priority IAS plants to be either controlled or eradicated completely by 2030.

The proliferation of Pontederia crassipes in large number across the water body of a wetland endangers it as excessive growth of the plant ‘inhibits the growth of fish and other aquatic organisms due to cut down of light and lack of oxygen’ according to experts.

In fact, at one point of time the plant was known as the ‘Terror of Bengal’ because of its rapid growth and domination across most water bodies in that State, rapidly affecting the fisheries and impacting rural economy drastically.

The Dehradun-based Wildlife Institute of India (WII) at one point of time had noted that ‘the gregarious growth of weeds like Brachiaria mutica and Alternanthera philoxeroides unless controlled, may pose a great threat to the biodiversity of the Keibul Lamjao National Park – habitat of the highly threatened Manipur Brow-antlered Deer’.

Defining Invasive Alien Species, Costello et al. (2022) says, “Alien species are organisms which are introduced to regions in which they would not be found naturally, as a result of unintentional or deliberate human action”.

“In the majority of cases, alien species are unable to survive in their new environment without human support. However, a small proportion will manage to adapt to their new surroundings and establish populations in the wild. Some of these alien species have negative impacts on the environment, for example predation or competition for resources with native animals or plants”.

The post The Plague of Introduced Species first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

Read more / Original news source: https://thefrontiermanipur.com/the-plague-of-introduced-species/

When Wetlands Beckon

In climate change dialogues, the significance of wetlands as carbon sinks has multiplied manifold, increasingly with new findings on how much of carbon wetlands can sequester, besides the knowledge on green forests serving as important carbon sinks that absorb excess carbon in the atmosphere to help in climate change mitigation. By Salam Rajesh As in […]

The post When Wetlands Beckon first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

By Salam Rajesh

As in the preceding years, the world community observed with solemnity the pledges to save, protect and conserve wetlands on the occasion of the annual World Wetlands Day ritual of social and environmental commitments, howsoever the mission appear far more than practicable to put words on ‘wetlands conservation’ in actuality.

The second day of February every year is dedicated to wetlands as a continued process of the global effort in raising awareness and commitments to saving much of the world’s fast disappearing water bodies of value to humans, wildlife and to nature itself.

An assessment by Hu et al. (2017, as quoted in Anisha, N.F., Mauroner, A., Lovett, G., Neher, A., Servos, M., Minayeva, T., Schutten, H. & Minelli, L. (2020). Locking Carbon in Wetlands: Enhancing Climate Action by Including Wetlands in NDCs. Corvallis, Oregon and Wageningen, The Netherlands: Alliance for Global Water Adaptation and Wetlands International) indicated that the area of wetland loss across the seven continents through the year 2009 and up to present times is considerably large.

Asia continent led the world in wetland area loss by a massive size of 2,646,100 sq km, followed by South America at a close second with a loss of 2,521,900 sq km. Europe figured with a considerably large loss of 972,200 sq km while North America lost 457,100 sq km, Africa 453,500 sq km and Oceania 181,600 sq km respectively.

This massive loss when counted in their totality can be seen to influence negative impacts on the living world, where even the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) says that currently near around 47,000 species of animals and plants globally are on the verge of extinction from various reasons including negative anthropogenic influences.

Why would then people in general worry for wetlands dying and disappearing ultimately? The reasons are not far to seek, if people do reconsider the numerous ecosystem services rendered by wetlands in their totality.

For instance, wetlands have strong links to ancient traditions, cultures, spiritual values and religious values that establish socio-cultural links of people to their roots, in particular for wetland dependent or wetland-thriving communities. Manipur has a link in the legacy of the Khamba-Thoibi legends.

While it is generally accepted that wetlands supply food through natural resources such as fish and edible aquatic plants and insects, and through agricultural practices in wetland areas, these water bodies play an important role in climate change resilience and carbon storage. They assist in the regulation of greenhouse gases, temperature, precipitation and other climatic processes.

Compared to tropical rainforests which were thought of to be the best carbon sinks in the natural world, new findings in this aspect throws light on how wetlands can absorb carbon many times more than tropical forests.

For instance, compared to tropical forests storing 200 tons of carbon dioxide per hectare in soil, peatlands can store a massive 4700 tons of carbon dioxide per hectare in soil. That is a difference by a huge margin.

Similarly, mangroves can store up to 2839 tons of carbon dioxide per hectare in soil, seagrass 500 tons of carbon dioxide per hectare in soil, and salt marsh up to 917 tons of carbon dioxide per hectare in soil, which definitely is quite significant in global discussions on carbon sequestration to meet the deadline on limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degree Celsius by year 2050.

Tropical forests are estimated to store up to 600 tons of carbon dioxide per hectare in their biomass, whereas, in the same measure mangroves are estimated to store as much as 928 tons of carbon dioxide per hectare in their biomass, which accounts for the global thrust on restoring and regenerating mangroves across most coastal belts around the world.

Wetlands play a major role in assisting with the storage and retention of water which helps flow regulation and provides flood and drought protection, and at the same time, wetlands assist in soil formation through sediment retention and accumulation of organic matter.

These, and much more, are the functional properties of wetlands in general, other than these water bodies providing leisure and fun for people seeking respite from the everyday grinding in life.

As in the preceding years, Manipur was not far behind other communities across the globe in observing the day with fervor and solemnity, urging local communities and the State to devout more time and energy in the larger objective of saving whether water bodies of value are left in the wild within the State.

The State’s Directorate of Environment and Climate Change along with other line departments hosted the day at Yaralpat wetland site in Imphal East District, extolling the importance of wetlands to achieve various ecosystem services including groundwater recharge, fisheries and livelihoods, while providing refuge for wildlife such as the wintering migratory water birds.

The day was also observed widely across the State at academic and civil society platforms, individually and with support from the Directorate.

Of significant contribution to the day was the pre-World Wetlands Day 2026 observation on Sunday, 01 February, where the fishing community residing at Champu Khangpok Floating Island Village within Loktak Lake staged a cleanup drive to clear plastics and other domestic wastes along Yangoi Turel Achouba (Nambul River) and its flow up to Birahari Pat within the lake, demonstrating the local community’s responsibility in lake conservation.

Rounding up, it can be well said that a partnership, and workable, model between wetland-dependent local communities and the responsible state agencies can go a long way in shaping the future of wetlands in Manipur, and elsewhere.

The post When Wetlands Beckon first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

Read more / Original news source: https://thefrontiermanipur.com/when-wetlands-beckon/

Where Is My Pat? A Reflection on Lamphelpat, Memory, and Misguided Development

Due to excessive excavation, Lamphelpat’s depth has reportedly reached around 8-10 metres. Such unscientific deepening directly violates basic wetland management principles. It raises a critical question: is Lamphelpat still a natural wetland, or has it been turned into an artificial water reservoir? By Maxstone Irom This article is born out of worry, longing, and deep […]

The post Where Is My Pat? A Reflection on Lamphelpat, Memory, and Misguided Development first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

By Maxstone Irom

This article is born out of worry, longing, and deep nostalgia of my childhood days around Lamphelpat. I grew up with this wetland as part of my everyday life. It was not just a landscape, it was a living space where memories were created, relationships were built, and nature quietly shaped who I am today. For me, Lamphelpat was never just water and land.

On February 2 2026, as part of World Wetlands Day, Go Green Group Manipur, a youth collective, initiated a reflection and listening circle called Pat Ki Wari. The idea was simple yet powerful: to reconnect with our wetlands and revisit the memories and meanings attached to them. As part of this initiative, we walked around Lamphelpat, observed its present condition, and shared stories rooted in our personal journeys. While much has changed, the place still holds immense emotional and cultural significance in my life.

Lamphelpat is one of my core memories. It is where I experienced my first boat ride. Every Sunday morning, I would go for a walk with my family to watch Urok (Threskiornis melanocephalus)and other birds, returning home with a bunch of thambal (lotus). During the monsoon, when the pat would flood, I accompanied my father to buy fresh fish. In winter, we went fishing together. Those mornings, with muddy slippers, small fishes in my hands, and my father’s quiet smile beside me, felt richer than anything money could buy. These were not extraordinary moments; they were ordinary days made meaningful by nature.

As I age, Lamphelpat continued to shape my life. During my teenage years, it became my refuge. Whenever I felt overwhelmed, confused, or restless, I would sit by the water for hours, finding peace in silence. With friends, I watched sunsets near the RIMS side of the pat, clicking countless photographs that still remind me of simpler times. Lamphelpat is not just a place; it is a place that raised me, comforted me, and quietly taught me how to breathe in difficult times. But today, I find myself asking: where is my pat?

After nearly three years, I was shocked when I returned. It no longer looked like the wetland I grew up with. Under the so called “Lamphelpat water body Rejuvenation Project,” implemented by the Water Resources Department and funded by the New Development Bank, large portions of the wetland have been dug up. The excavated silt has been piled into artificial hills, permanently altering the natural landscape. What was once a living ecosystem now resembles a construction site.

As an environmental science student, this transformation raises serious concerns. According to the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017, the depth of a wetland should not exceed 6 meters. However, due to excessive excavation, Lamphelpat’s depth has reportedly reached around 8-10 metres. Such unscientific deepening directly violates basic wetland management principles. It raises a critical question: is Lamphelpat still a natural wetland, or has it been turned into an artificial water reservoir?

This seemingly unscientific dredging has also destabilized the surrounding infrastructure. Roads connecting important institutions such as Shija Hospital and the National Institute of Technology have started sinking. To address this, an overbridge had to be constructed, an expensive solution to a problem that could have been avoided with proper planning.

Lamphelpat is also home to Manipur’s famous indigenous pony. The swampy terrain once provided a safe and natural space for grazing and movement. Today, however, due to altered water levels, deep excavated pits, and unstable ground, several ponies have reportedly died after falling into these areas. What was once a natural playground and shelter has now been turned into a death trap created by human negligence and poor planning.

A report on East Mojo has also suggested that parts of nearby villages experienced flooding after the project’s implementation. When a wetland’s natural water-holding and drainage capacity is disrupted, such consequences are inevitable. Instead of reducing disaster risks, this project appears to have increased them.

Equally worrying is the rapid growth of concrete structures around Lamphelpat. Buildings are coming up in every direction, slowly replacing this wetland. In recent years, several new government buildings, hospitals, and offices have also been constructed within and around parts of the wetland. This has led to encroachment and fragmentation of Lamphelpat.. This severely disrupts water flow, wildlife movement, and ecological balance. This unchecked unplanned urbanization further weakens the wetland’s ecological function and isolates it from its natural surroundings. A wetland cannot survive when it is slowly suffocated by cement and divided by unplanned construction.

***Overbridge construction in progress at Lamphelpat***

Under the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017, wetlands are meant to be protected from unscientific alteration, encroachment, and ecological degradation. The Manipur State Wetland Authority is responsible for ensuring protection of all the wetland in the state.

Yet, in the case of Lamphelpat, there is little public evidence of strict monitoring, transparent assessment, or community consultation. This reflects a serious failure of governance and accountability.

Let me be clear: development and rejuvenation are necessary. Wetlands do require restoration, maintenance, and protection. But development without ecological understanding is destruction in disguise. True rejuvenation should strengthen a wetland’s natural character, not erase it.

Till today, no comprehensive environmental impact assessment of this project has been made publicly accessible. There is no clear record of meaningful consultation with local communities, ecologists, traditional users, or independent researchers. This lack of transparency raises serious doubts about the legitimacy of the entire project.

Lamphelpat did not need to be dug. It needed protection from encroachment, pollution, and unplanned construction. It needed proper waste management, biodiversity conservation, and community participation. Instead, it received heavy machinery and cosmetic “development” that prioritised appearance over ecology.

What hurts the most is not just the physical transformation, but the emotional loss. A space that once nurtured childhoods, livelihoods, culture, and biodiversity is slowly being stripped of its soul. When a wetland dies, a part of our collective memory dies with it. For many of us, Lamphelpat is not a project site. It is memory, identity, and heritage.

If we truly care about sustainable development, then projects like this must be fundamentally rethought. Policies must respect science, local knowledge, and lived experiences. Youth voices, indigenous knowledge, and environmental expertise should be central, not optional.

This reflection is not just an expression of nostalgia. It is a call to action for authorities to answer, for institutions to take responsibility, and for citizens to demand better. We still have time to correct our mistakes. We still have time to restore Lamphelpat with wisdom, sensitivity, and accountability.

If we cannot save Lamphelpat, a wetland that raised generations of us, what hope do we have of
saving anything at all?

(Maxstone Irom is a writer and poet from Manipur, India, known for his published works in local newspapers and online platforms, often focusing on the social and political issues of his home state.)

The post Where Is My Pat? A Reflection on Lamphelpat, Memory, and Misguided Development first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

Demand for ST status, Chinks in Biren’s armour and Army vs Police

The BJP in Manipur had gathered more MLAs belonging to other parties to join ranks with them either by joining the party or lending support to the extent that the treasury bench today has 55 members sitting in it against the five in the opposition belonging to the Congress and as such the threat is […]

The post Demand for ST status, Chinks in Biren’s armour and Army vs Police first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

By Yambem Laba

The movement for inclusion of the Meetei Tribe in the Scheduled List of tribes of India got a major fillip when the Manipur High Court gave a directive to the Manipur state government to give a response to the query from the Centre pending since 2013. The reply is to be given in one month’s time. The directive came after a petition by the Meetei Tribes Union, Manipur. It might be recalled that the Ministry of Tribal Affairs of the Government of India had sought the recommendation of the Manipur state government to enlist the Meitei in the ST List on 29 May 2013. In that letter, the Union Tribal Ministry had sought a report on the ethnographic and socio-economic survey of the Meitieis but had sat on it.

The Scheduled Demand Committee Manipur (STDCM), who had been in the forefront of the movement for the last 20 years or so, had welcomed the High Court’s directive which was arrived at by a single bench of the Manipur High Court of Acting Chief Justice M V Muralidharan. The STDCM had also garnered signatures of almost all the MLAs of the valley where the Meiteis reside. A Writ of Mandamus was filed by Mutum Churamani, secretary of the Meitei Tribes Union and seven others of the Union against the state of Manipur.

According to the petition, it was asserted that the Census carried by the Government of India since 2011 had been classifying Meeteis as a Tribe of the State and it was thus till Manipur’s merger with the Indian Union on 21 September 1949. Ajoy Pebam, the counsel for the petitioners, argued that the Meeteis lost the tribal tag after signing the Merger Agreement in 1949 and restoration of the status is imperative to preserve the ancestral land, traditions and culture. Various documentary references were annexed to the petition asserting that the Meeteis are still a tribe as per Articles 342(1) and 366(19), and 230(25) of the Indian Constitution and unfortunately, the Meeteis were left out while preparing the ST list under Article 342 of the Constitution, he added. He also added that the Chongthu, Khoibu and Mate tribes were classified as Scheduled Tribes of the Union as per an order of the Gauhati High Court dated 26 May 2003.

Appearing on behalf of the Government of India, the Deputy Solicitor General of India also conceded that the Meeteis lost their tribal status after the state’s merger with the Indian Union. The Court also observed that the Meitei Tribe Union had also submitted a representation to the Union Minister of Tribal Affairs on 18 April 2022 to include the Meeteis in the ST list and the Ministry had forwarded the same to Chief Secretary and again it was swept under the carpet. At this juncture, the counsel for the petitioners asserted that the continued silence of the successive state governments were tantamount to violation of the Right to Equality and Right to Life with Dignity which are enshrined under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The Court also observed that the state had not given any satisfactory explanation for not submitting the recommendations which the Centre has been seeking for the last 10 years.

Apart from the STDCM and the Meitei Tribe Union, the World Meitei Council and the Kangleipak Kanba Lup (KKL) had been vociferously demanding for the inclusion of the Meeteis in the ST List. The KKL had gone one step further and asked Union Home Minister Amit Shah to decide on the ST Status of the Meeteis before signing the final accord with the rebel Nagas viz the NSCN(I-M) and others.

It should also be on record that whilst the Constitution was being prepared, the then Constituent Assembly of India had deputed the late Gopinath Bordoloi of Assam and Stanley Nicholas Roy of the then Khasi and Jaintia Hills (now Meghalaya) to Manipur to seek the views of the Meeteis on the question of being included in the ST list. They, however, did not meet the public, but had just met three personalities, two Meitei Brahmins amongst them. They were Dwijamani Dev Sharma, Krishna Mohan Singh and another one, who were fanatical Hindus. They asserted that the Hindus, who are the descendants of the Aryans, be classified as Tribals. This is how the Meeteis had missed the bus in 1950 when India adopted the Constitution.

However, it needs to be pointed out that the then RK Ranbir government in 1991 had imposed prohibition in Manipur following a ban on sale of liquor in Manipur by the proscribed People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of Manipur. Likewise, the reluctance of the successive governments of Manipur, beginning from 2013 till now, must have been reluctant to forward the recommendation of the inclusion of the Meeteis in the ST list because of the opposition of the outlawed and oldest insurgent group in Manipur, the United National Liberation Front (UNLF), had been against the idea of the Meeteis being classified as a Scheduled Tribe. They first launched their tirade through their Students and Civil Society Organisations who are their fronts in the public.

Five years ago, I was summoned to the CHQ of the UNLF in Myanmar as I had been quite vocal and had written in favour of the demand of the STDCM. I was asked to explain my position on it. When asked as to whether they had openly declared their stance against it, the reply was “No”. Then the issue was settled – if one can assume that statements issued by their fronts can be assumed to be that of the UNLF. Then my interrogators remained silent. Two years later, the UNLF in their annual statement announced the UNLF’s stance against the demand of the Meeties of being classified as a Scheduled Tribe as it negates the existence of Manipur, particularly the Meeteis’ 2000 years of existence as a nation state and civilisation. The suzerainty of the Meitei Kings had once upon a time spanned from the banks of the Chindwin in Myanmar to that of the Surma in present day Bangladesh. But after joining India, the Meeteis are now confined to a mere 9 per cent of the state’s total geographical area. Their future is bleak as they cannot settle down in the remaining 90 per cent of the state’s area which are scheduled tribal lands belonging to the various scheduled tribes of Manipur while the reverse is not true. However, the question is, if the Biren Government is not afraid to defy the PLAs diktat of prohibition and had recently lifted prohibition from Manipur, why it is afraid to stand against the UNLF stance against the ST tag for the Meeteis. But now with the directive from the High Court, the reply might be coming shortly.

CHINKS IN CM BIREN’S ARMOUR

While pondering over the High Court’s directive, the Biren Ministry received a jolt. It began with former minister and now MLA from the Heirok Assembly Constituency and Advisor to the Chief Minister Th Radheshyam resigning from his post, citing lack of any responsibility being given to him. He said he did not know how to answer the questions raised by his supporters when they urged him to take up an issue with the CM. He also said that while the CM was talking about environmental protection, his own younger brother was allegedly involved in timber trade. His move was followed by former minister and MLA from Langthabal Assembly Constituency and Chairman of the Manipur Tourism Corporation Karam Shyam Singh, who also resigned from his post.

He also cited not being not only being given any responsibilities and power, and of being humiliated publicly on numerous occasions by the Chief Minister. Then the third to throw in his towel was Paonam Brojen from Wangjing Assembly Constituency and was holding the post of Chairman of the Manipur Development Society (MDS). He went public as to how the Chief Minister had dumped him after, upon his advice, his workers were made to engage in road constructions in his constituency. Then suddenly, he was informed that the work orders for the already constructed works had been cancelled. His workers, having expended about Rs 6 crore in the process, are now fuming and Brojen now says that he is not able to stay at his home as he cannot face his workers and give them an explanation.

According to sources, there are about 15 BJP MLAs reportedly camping in Delhi demanding the replacement of N Biren Singh as the Chief Minister. Although the BJP returned 32 in the House of 60 at the last hustings, only six MLAs out of the 32 when Biren Singh was elected as the leader of the BJP Legislative Party last year. BJP Big-wig Sambit Patra had orchestrated the drama and he had reportedly/allegedly asked Govindas Konthoujam, who had joined the BJP after having resigned as the President of the Congress in Manipur, on the eve of the elections last year to propose Biren Singh’s name as the leader. Then another tribal MLA seconded the proposal and he became Chief Minister.

The BJP on the other hand had gathered more MLAs belonging to other parties to join ranks with them either by joining the BJP or lending support to the extent that the treasury bench today has 55 members sitting in it against the five in the opposition belonging to the Congress and as such the threat is not real. But the fact remains that dissent within the Party has already surfaced against the Chief Minister and it is a point to be noted.

ARMY VERSUS POLICE

In the meantime, one Manipuri army officer Major Thokchom Bhagatjit Singh belonging to 2nd Madras Regiment had posted on social media remarks critical of Chief Minister N Biren Singh. His elders back home, aware of the sensitivity of CM Biren on social media posts, had advised him to delete his post. CM Biren had earlier slapped the National Security Act on numerous occasions for such posts criticising him or his government directly or indirectly. So the young Major deleted the post from the account which was opened under another name and he returned home on leave. That was when the Sekmai Police of the Imphal West District came and picked him upon intimation from the Cyber Crime unit of the Manipur Police. This arrest was made properly as an arrest memo was issued and an FIR registered and he was produced before the Magistrate 24 hours after he was taken into custody. This was on 13 April, earlier this month. Then on the same day, one Md. Aksar Ali, president of the BJP’s Minority Morcha, filed another complaint against the Major at the Porompat Police Station in Imphal East. He was again arrested, but this time no arrest memos were issued and no FIR was lodged, yet he was kept in the lockup for 18 hours. That was when the army stepped in and they came to the Porompat Police Station and told the police that they can arrest an army man on charges of rape, murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder, and not for any charges including posts on social media. The police then made a hasty retreat. The officer may be facing a court of inquiry from his commanding officer but not from the police or civil court.

The CM apparently has an army of cyber warriors who will troll anyone posting against him or the government on social media. But this time it had bitten off more than it could chew, it seems.

(The writer is a senior journalist at The Statesman. This article was first published by The Statesman. All opinions expressed here are the writer’s own and do not represent the views of TFM)

The post Demand for ST status, Chinks in Biren’s armour and Army vs Police first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

ST Demand Issue: Positive discrimination, affirmative action and the cracks within

India’s reservation policy has spawned forms of conflicting categories of the ‘exploiter’ and the ‘exploited’, the ‘dominant’ and the ‘subservient’ as if these binaries exist in a permanent cycle sans the dynamics of wresting political power at play. By Dhiren A. Sadokpam In recent times, the political elites of three primary ethnic groups in Manipur […]

The post ST Demand Issue: Positive discrimination, affirmative action and the cracks within first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

By Dhiren A. Sadokpam

In recent times, the political elites of three primary ethnic groups in Manipur are caught in a whirlpool of anxiety propelled by palpable dissonance in political objectives. This anxiety is not necessarily triggered by the differences in speculative autonomy-demands or even demands based on administrative separatism.

The main anxiety has been caused by the way how the communities have effectively understood the political ideas behind positive discrimination, affirmative action or what in the Indian subcontinent is being referred to as the reservation policy of communities that have apparently lagged behind in holistic development. The most recent play-out that has triggered the spells of anxiety and tension has been the demand of a community considered advanced in comparison to its neighbours, to be included in the Scheduled List of Tribes in India.

While the proponents of the demand and those opposing the same have resorted to socio-political and historical reasoning, both the parties seem to have skipped re-looking at either redefining or refining the concepts they would love to toy with. One is not sure if both the conflicting parties have understood that India’s reservation policy presupposes a social fact – centuries of oppression of one group by another. This presupposition assumes a determinate but constant ‘unchanging oppressor and oppressed’ and ‘advanced’ and ‘backward’ communities. The ‘constant’ is supposedly created by a social order that determined identities of each castes, communities and tribes. This has spawned forms of conflicting categories of the ‘exploiter’ and the ‘exploited’, the ‘dominant’ and the ‘subservient’ as if these binaries exist in a permanent cycle in all societies sans the dynamics of wresting political power at play.

For the mainland India, these terms are defined in relation to the hereditary caste order whereas for Northeast India, the same has been defined by amorphous understandings of communities guided by colonial agenda of the British whose administrators first chose to categorize people from the mixed-prism of the caste order or an anthropological understanding of a system which they considered was durable.

It is against this backdrop that United Naga Council, Manipur (UNC) and the Kuki Inpi Manipur (KIM) have raised objections to the Manipur High Court’s directive to the Government of Manipur to send its recommendation for the inclusion of Meetei Community in the list of Scheduled list of Tribes to the Government of India. The directive of the high court was passed on March 27.

Strident Voices and Social Tension

The UNC stated that “the Meitei/Meetei community of Manipur is an advanced community of India” with their language, Manipuri (Meiteilon) listed in the Eight Schedule to the constitution of India.

“They are already protected under Constitution of India and categorized as (i) General (ii) Other Backward Classes (OBC) and (iii) Schedule Caste (SC),” said the UNC.

UNC termed it irrational that the High Court of Manipur directed the Government of Manipur to recommend for inclusion of Meitei/Meetei community in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) list of India, “negating the sole objective of scheduling group of people for protective discrimination as ST in the Constitution of India”. The Naga body has strongly condemned and called the high court order “inane” for making “such imbecilic recommendation despite strong opposition from Scheduled tribes of the state”.

The common refrain and rationale behind the objections raised by both UNC and KIM has been rubbished by the proponents of those demanding a Scheduled Tribe status for the Meetei community. One strident voice has been that of the Kangleipak Kanba Lup (KKL). KKL has critiqued the objections in their own characteristic way stating that the demand for the inclusion of Meetei in the Scheduled list of Tribes in the Constitution of India is not aimed at grabbing “jobs” either from the Naga or Kuki communities of Manipur. It has asserted that the demand is based on safeguarding their “little bit of land” now confined to less than 2000 square kilometers out of the 20,000 square kilometers of the entire state of Manipur.

The KKL has made it clear that the Naga and the Kuki communities need not fear about grabbing “their job reservation quotas currently enforced in Manipur which will remain status quo”. The organization also unequivocally asserted that the UNC and KIM have “no birth right” to deny any other scheduled tribes of India that job opportunity.

The KKL had a message for the UNC too. It reiterated that the Manipuri Language being classified as scheduled languages of India under the Eight Schedule has nothing to do with the classification of the Meetei as a scheduled tribe of India. “Anyway Manipuri language is not confined to the Meeteis only but serves as a Lingua Franca amongst all the tribal communities of Manipur be it between the Nagas and the Kukis but amongst their various sub-tribes also”, it pointed out.

Moreover, the UNC has also been reminded that it was Th Muivah, the top National Socialist Council of Nagalim (NSCN-IM) leader who had stated that “only the Nagas and the Meeteis are the indigenous peoples” of Manipur. KKL asked, “So what is the idea of joining hands with the Kukis to block the way for the survival of the Meeteis under the Indian Constitution”. To the question of Meeteis being more advanced than the other tribes of Manipur, KKL asserted that it has nothing to do with genealogy but “mode of production” experienced by the communities.

The Meetei community began to practice settled agriculture and had more time to concentrate on arts, culture and literature while the hill tribes hitherto used to follow a different form of agriculture “before switching to poppy plantation” in recent times that had made them “all become rich”, said KKL.

The organization winded up their statement on a harsher note stating that it would be wrong on the part of both the Naga and the Kuki communities to consider the Meetei community as their “common enemy or else will be constrained to oppose every move or demand made by any tribal group either Naga or Kuki”.

The exchange of statements may not lead towards a reconciliation on the sensitive topic. As the articulation of the issue by those supporting the demand for inclusion of Meetei in Scheduled Tribe list up the ante on their movement, the objections by Naga and Kuki tribal bodies may get shriller by the day.

Empowerment and Social Justice

In all these voices, what has been missed is a dispassionate inter-community/ethnic group deliberation on what would be the best option for all communities to progress and under what protective or empowering mechanism. While the fact of discrimination cannot be denied in one’s everyday experience, ethnicization or communalization of the issue would only create unbridgeable distance between communities. Under such circumstances, one will not be able to project the fact that there are no permanent oppressor and permanent oppressed or instil the fact that the idea of permanent and constant binaries will lead to over-generalization of a theoretical framework to achieve quick practical results.

What is of utmost importance now is truly and honestly grasping the fact that emancipating the socially underprivileged and the marginalized irrespective of community or tribal affiliation or within the same community is a move towards social justice. While doing so, one should not forget that the idea of empowerment of the individual has a far greater value and virtue than a protective mechanism that tends to perpetuate redundant binaries or historical contradictions.

Here, it should also be noted that India’s reservation policy emerged out of a deep flaw in understanding the complex relationship between the conceptions of the ‘cultural/social’ and the ‘economic’. Having said this, elsewhere, this writer had also argued that the stereotyping of the Meetei as a Hindu society both within Manipur and outside, in the image of mainland Hindu ethos and practices has manufactured the idea of the ‘constant exploiter’ and the ‘constant exploited’ in Manipur.

While Hinduised Meeteis have been identified with the former, all other non-Hindu communities are shown as ‘exploited’. Such is the handiwork of those who harp on the ‘politics of divide’ and benefit from it; and endorsed by the ‘ignorant other’ who is happy to own up anything that comes closer to the intolerant and imagined pan-Indian vision.

(Dhiren A. Sadokpam is Editor-in-Chief, The Frontier Manipur. This article was first published by EastMojo under the title ‘ST demand for Meetei: First, acknowledge the cracks within’)

The post ST Demand Issue: Positive discrimination, affirmative action and the cracks within first appeared on The Frontier Manipur.

People’s Resistance at Yaithibi

Democracy works in ugly ways wherein people have to bleed to live. Man being a social animal lives in a society. Ours being an agrarian society, agriculture is the largest economic activity of the people of the state. The economic system is called capitalism using a political system called democracy. We live as a society […]

Read more / Original news source: http://kanglaonline.com/2016/11/peoples-resistance-at-yaithibi/